Category: Research and paranormal



Extrait d’un article paru dans me magazine Nexus de septembre 2013 :
Mike Gravel, ancien sénateur ( libertaire ) de l’Etat d’Alaska , 1969-1981 :

image

Il siégeait parmi les parlementaires invités aux auditions de citoyens ( citizen disclosure about UFO ans ET ) en mai dernier.

J’étais vraiment très sceptique sur le sujet avant de lire la documentation pour préparer les auditions.
On rapporte un millier d’observations ( d’OVNI ) par mois sur la planète.  
Les auditions et les éléments probants et irréfutables permettent d’apprécier le sujet comme étant le plus important de notre temps : la présence d’extraterrestres qui prennent la mesure de ce qui se passe sur notre planète et qui ne révèlent pas ouvertement leur présence pour diverses raisons […]
L’enjeu est donc ici que la population se familiarise avec la réalité d’une présence extraterrestre. […]
Je m’investis en faveur de la démocratie directe et contre les systèmes représentatifs qui tendent a préserver le pouvoir des élites en place.
>>

Publicités

http://www.arcturius.org/chroniques/?p=17484&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews

Extrait:

Pour ceux qui avaient encore des doutes en ce qui a trait aux contacts extra-terrestres avec nos anciennes civilisations, cette fois, on ne peut plus clairs! Le gouvernement mexicain a frappé un grand coup dans l’histoire cachée de l’humanité. Dans la section archéologie oubliée, le pays dévoilera publiquement une série de pièces Mayas découvertes il y environ 80 ans par une équipe du National Institute of Anthropoly and History (INAH) sur le site de Calakmul au Mexique.

Ces pièces exceptionnelles ont déjà été présentées l’an dernier et feront l’objet d’un documentaire qui sortira cet automne et qui sera produit par Raul Julia-Levy et réalisé par Juan Carlos Rulfo, le gagnant du festival Sundance 2006 avec son film « In the pit ». Ce documentaire porte le nom provisoire « Revelations of the Mayans 2012 and beyond ».

L’une des pièces maîtresses dévoilées est un disque on ne peut plus explicite. On peut y voir clairement 4 engins, communément appelés OVNI, dont l’une démontre par une extraction, un astronaute (5) aux commandes de son engin (6). Les deux cercles au centre (1) sont présentement considérés comme une planète à atmosphère de par les deux cercles le suggérant et qu’on peut supposer être la Terre du fait de la présence d’un astre à proximité qui semble être la Lune. À droite, ce qui semble être une comète (3) avec un OVNI (2) dans son sciage, puis, à gauche, un autre engin (4) qui semble intervenir directement sur la comète comme porteur d’un bélier pour frapper la comète.
>>


Dans la bible l’histoire de l’Humanité commence avec Adam et Eve.

Des religieux aurait estimé cela il y a 5 ou 6000 ans, ce qui n’a pas de sens.

Tandis que d’après les historiens, l’Homme moderne, l’Homo Sapiens existe depuis environ 200 000 ans en Afrique.

homo sapiens , homo neandertalis, homo erectus

Homo Erectus (4), puis neandertal(7), puis sapiens (2),

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Avant lui il y avait l’Homo Erectus, de – 2 000 000 à -200 000 environ.

Il y a 150 000 ou 200 000 ans environ il y a eu une évolution, la fin de l’Homo Erectus et l’évolution vers l’Homo Neandertal et l’évolution ( ou la création ) de l’Homo Sapiens, notre Homme moderne.

En effet la thèse d’une création de l’Homo Sapiens il y a 150 000 ou 200 000 ans environ est corroboré par les chercheurs en ADN :

Ils ont trouvé notre ancêtre commun femelle, surnommée l’Eve mitochindriale il y a 150 000 ans environ :

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%88ve_mitochondriale

Ces chercheurs en ADN ont aussi trouvé un ancetre commun male, l’Adam Y chromosomique, il y a environ 142 000 ans :

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Y-chromosomique

J’imagine donc que le récit de la bible ( lui même basé sur des écrits plus anciens ) essaye de nous transmettre une vrai histoire, l’histoire de nos ancêtres, Adam et Eve.

A cette époque il existait des humains, de type néandertal, mais par une modification génétique, on a donné naissance  une nouvelle espèce, notre Eve, ou notre couple Adam et Eve.

Est ce que cette modification génétique est arrivée par hasard ? Est ce le résultat d’une création ? D’un croisement avec une espèce venue d’ailleurs ?…

Un thèse explique qu’une autre espèce plus avancée, venue d’une autre planète, on peut les appeler des anges, des Elohim, des Dieux, ou des extra-terrestres, aurait fait cette création ou ce croisement génétique, a leur image, c’est  à dire en mélangeant leurs gènes avec ceux des hommes de néandertal présents, afin de créer l’Homo Sapiens.

Les Hommes auraient essayé de garder une trace de cette histoire  travers des récits qui ont traversé les ages jusqu’à nous.


Extrait du magazine nexus de juillet 2013 :
Dossier au sujet du Citizen Hearing on disclosure, le groupe qui fait des auditions au congres américain pour rendre public les secrets sur les ovnis.

Interview de colonel Richard French : « ma profession : UFO debunker »

Lire la suite


http://www.antonparks.com/main.php?page=eden

le vrai chainon manquant. La Création de l’humanité, rien que cela !

Descendons nous des singes ou avons nous été créés ?

http://citizenhearing.org/

 

 


http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/56303/CNN__Have_UFOs_Been_To_Earth___29th_September_2010/

http://youtu.be/73ZiDEtVms8

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7qf49_ovni-detruit-missile-nucleaire_news

Lors d’un dîner Ufologique à Paris j’avais discuté moi même avec un ancien militaire Français qui m’avait raconté la même chose en France : Des OVNI qui interféraient avec les armes nucléaires Françaises ! C’est difficile à croire, mais c’est bien la vérité.

Sans que l’on sache toujours pas d’ou viennent ces OVNIs, il y a des intelligences venus d’ailleurs qui se soucient de l’usage que notre civilisation humaine fait des armes nucléaires. Doit on s’inquiéter ou plutôt être rassurés ?

Ces intelligences n’interviennent pas lorsque faisons des génocides et tuons des millions d’humains, n’interfèrent pas dans les affaires humaines, mais lorsque nos armes nucléaires ont la capacité de détruire toute vie sur terre des centaines de fois, alors c’est semble t il leur ligne rouge, même si ils tiennent à rester discrets pour en pas interférer avec notre évolution semble t il, probablement pour ne pas trop nous déstabiliser et nous laisser avancer à notre rythme.

Nous sommes comme des enfants qui ne doivent pas jouer avec des allumettes.

Les autorités de nos pays ont du mal à reconnaître, cela serait un aveu de faiblesse : imaginez un chef des armées reconnaissant, oui notre espace aérien est une passoire, nous sommes tous les jours survolés par des appareils non identifiés et notre arsenal nucléaire est sous contrôle de ces entités inconnues. Un chef des armés qui dit cela devrait normalement donner sa démission, mais que faire d’autre ? Le public est-il enfin prêt à entendre et comprendre ce qui se passe réellement ?  En 2012 va-t-on enfin faire entrer l’humanité dans le concert des civilisations de notre galaxie ?


(en Francais plus bas)

Comme le site web Wikileaks UFO a ete censure, je publie au moins ce qui est deja connu sur Wikipedia au sujet de l’incident Ovni de Teheran en 1976 avec des documents officiels Americains comme preuves.

As Wikileaks Ufo has already been cesnored, I publish here at least what is already known on Wikipedia about the 1976 Tehran Ufo incident with official documents to prove it.

1976 Tehran UFO incident

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

The 1976 Tehran UFO Incident was a radar and visual sighting of an unidentified flying object (UFO) over Tehran, the capital of Iran, during the early morning hours of 19 September 1976. The incident is particularly notable for the electromagnetic interference effects observed upon aircraft coming within close proximity to the object: two F-4 Phantom II jet interceptors independently lost instrumentation and communications as they approached, only to have them restored upon withdrawal; one of the aircraft suffered temporary weapons systems failure, while preparing to open fire.

The incident, extensively recorded in a four-page U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report distributed to at least the White House, Secretary of State, Joint Chiefs of Staff, National Security Agency (NSA) and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), remains one of the most well-documented military encounters with anomalous phenomena in history, and various senior Iranian military officers directly involved with the events have gone on public record stating their belief that the object was not of terrestrial origin.

Map of Iran and surrounding countries, showing Tehran and Hamadan, where two F-4 jet interceptors were launched

[edit] The incident

At approximately 0030 hours local time (2100Z), 19 September 1976, the Imperial Iranian Air Force command post at Tehran received four reports by telephone, from civilians in the Shemiran city district, of unusual activity in the night sky. Some callers reported seeing a bird-like object; others reported a helicopter with a bright light.

When the command post found no helicopters airborne to account for the reports, they called General Yousefi, assistant deputy commander of operations. General Yousefi at first said the object was only a star, but after conferring with the control tower at Mehrabad International Airport and then looking for himself to see a very bright object larger than a star, he decided to scramble one F-4 Phantom II jet fighter from Shahrokhi Air Force Base in Hamadan, approximately 175 miles (282 km) west of Tehran. (for location see map at right)

At 0130 hours (2200Z), the F-4, piloted by Captain Mohammad Reza Azizkhani was launched and proceeded to a point 40 nautical miles (74 km) north of Tehran. It was noted that the object was of such brilliance that it could be seen from 70 miles (110 km) away. When the aircraft approached to approximately 25 nautical miles (46 km) from the object, the jet suddenly lost all instrumentation and communications capabilities, prompting Azizkhani to break off the intended intercept and turn back toward Shahrohki; upon the evasion, both systems resumed functioning.

An Iran Air Force F-4D.

At 0140 hours, a second F-4 was scrambled, piloted by Lieutenant Parviz Jafari. Jafari would eventually retire as a general and participate on 12 November 2007, at a National Press Club conference demanding a worldwide investigation into UFO phenomena.[1][2][3][4][5] (see also below) Jafari’s jet had acquired a radar lock on the object at 27 nautical miles (50 km) range. The radar signature of the UFO resembled that of a Boeing 707 aircraft. Closing on the object at 150 nautical miles (280 km) per hour and at a range of 25 nautical miles (46 km), the object began to move, keeping a steady distance of 25 nautical miles (46 km) from the F-4. The size of the object was difficult to determine due to its intense brilliance. The lights of the object were alternating blue, green, red, and orange, and were arranged in a square pattern. The lights flashed in sequence, but the flashing was so rapid that they all could be seen at once.

While the object and the F-4 continued on a southerly path, a smaller second object detached itself from the first and advanced on the F-4 at high speed. Lieutenant Jafari thinking he was under attack, tried to launch an AIM-9 sidewinder missile, but he suddenly lost all instrumentation, including weapons control, and all communication. He later stated he attempted to eject, but this also was to no avail as it malfunctioned. Jafari then instituted a turn and a negative G dive as evasive action. The object fell in behind him at about 3 to 4 nautical miles (7.4 km) distance for a short time, then turned and rejoined the primary object.

Once again, as soon as the F-4 had turned away, instrumentation and communications were regained. The F-4 crew then saw another brightly lit object detach itself from the other side of the primary object and drop straight down at high speed. The F-4 crew expected it to impact the ground and explode, but it came to rest gently. The F-4 crew then overflew the site at a decreased altitude and marked the position of the light’s touchdown. Jafari would later comment that the object was so bright that it lit up the ground and he could see rocks around it. The object had touched down nearby Rey Oil Refinery on the outskirts of Iran. Then they landed at Mehrabad, noting that each time they passed through a magnetic bearing of 150 degrees from Mehrabad, they experienced interference and communications failure.

A civilian airliner that was approaching Mehrabad also experienced a loss of communications at the same position relative to Mehrabad. As the F-4 was on final approach, they sighted yet another object, cylinder-shaped, with bright, steady lights on each end and a flashing light in the middle. The object overflew the F-4 as they were on approach. Mehrabad tower reported no other aircraft in the area, but tower personnel were able to see the object when given directions by Jafari. Years later, the main controller and an investigating general revealed that the object also overflew the control tower and knocked out all of its electronic equipment as well (see below).

The next day, the F-4 crew flew out in a helicopter to the site where they had seen the smaller object land. In the daylight, it was determined to be a dry lake bed, but no traces could be seen. They then circled the area to the west and picked up a noticeable « beeper » signal. The signal was loudest near a small house, so they landed and questioned the occupants of the house about any unusual events of the previous night. They reported a loud noise and a bright light like lightning.

Further investigation of the landing site, including radiation testing of the area was apparently done, but the results were never made public. Since this event occurred before the fall of the Shah, any records in Tehran itself may be lost.

[edit] D.I.A. form

Alongside the report there was a form from the DIA which assessed the quality of the report. The form indicated in checked boxes that the content was of high value, that the report was confirmed by other sources, and that the utility of the information was potentially useful to them. The form from the DIA also stated the following:

« An outstanding report. This case is a classic which meets all the criteria necessary for a valid study of the UFO phenomenon:
a) The object was seen by multiple witnesses from different locations (i.e., Shamiran, Mehrabad, and the dry lake bed) and viewpoints (both airborne and from the ground).
b) The credibility of many of the witnesses was high (an Air Force general, qualified aircrews, and experienced tower operators).
c) Visual sightings were confirmed by radar.
d) Similar electromagnetic effects (EME) were reported by three separate aircraft.
e) There were physiological effects on some crew members (i.e., loss of night vision due to the brightness of the object).
f) An inordinate amount of maneuverability was displayed by the UFOs. »

[edit] Opinions of some participants

In 1994, Sightings TV program tracked down and interviewed various principals involved in the incident. Nearly all expressed the opinion that they were dealing with a high-technology extraterrestrial craft.[6]

One of the pilots of the first jet interceptor, Yaddi Nazeri, estimated that the UFO was traveling somewhere between two and three thousand miles per hour. He said that the object « …was beyond my speed and power. The [later] F-4… also could not catch up to the object. That’s when I thought, this is a UFO. » Nazeri added that « …no country had this type of flying object, so I was thinking, this craft is from another planet. »

The second F-4 pilot, General Parviz Jafari, said that after trying to fire a missile and failing, they feared for their lives and tried to eject, but the eject button also malfunctioned.[7] At a Washington D.C. press conference on November 12, 2007, Jafari added details that the main object emitted four objects, one that headed towards him and later returned to the main object a short while later, one which he tried unsuccessfully to fire on, another which followed him back, and one which landed on the desert floor and glowed. Following his prepared statement at the press conference, Jafari was asked if he believed he had encountered an alien spacecraft and Pirouzi said he was quite certain that he had. (see below for further details and references)

General Nader Yousefi, the assistant deputy commander of the Iranian Air Force, said he ordered the two jet interceptions. He said that, « Because of the experience I had on September 19, 1976, I believe there is something up there. We just don’t know what it is or where it came from. »

Yousefi repeated many of the details of the encounter already recorded in the DIA document but also added a few more. Yousefi said that after the second F-4 lost its communications and weapons systems and took evasive maneuvers, it tried one last pursuit of the UFO. Even approaching at Mach 2, the UFO easily outdistanced it. The pilots decided to return to Mehrabad airport. As they were approaching to land, Yousefi said the control tower phoned him that the UFO was following the jet back to base.

The control tower supervisor, Hossein Pirouzi, told Sightings that the pilot was in a panic with the large UFO on its tail. According to Pirouzi and other controllers, the UFO performed a low-altitude flyby over Mehrabad at about 2200 to 2,500 feet (760 m). It was described as a cylinder-shaped object as large as a tour bus, with bright steady lights on each end and a flasher in the middle. During the flyby, the control tower lost all power, although other parts of the airport were unaffected. After the flyby, the UFO took off to the west and was spotted 25 minutes later over the Mediterranean by an Egyptian Air Force pilot, then again over Lisbon, Portugal by the pilot, crew, and passengers of a KLM flight, reporting that it was speeding westward over the Atlantic Ocean.

The following day, an investigation was held in Tehran. The Iranian Air Force Deputy Commander, Lieutenant General Abdollah Azarbarzin, conducted interviews with all of the principals and wrote up a report. Gen. Jafari, the second F-4 pilot, stated that he was among those interviewed and an American colonel sat there and took notes. This information later appeared in the D.I.A. account of the incident.

Tower controller Pirouzi was also among those interviewed. He recalled a discussion by Azarbarzin’s panel at the conclusion of the meeting. « When they heard our report and the report of the pilots, they concluded that no country is capable of such technology, and all of them believed it was a strange object from outer space. » [8]

When interviewed by Sightings, Azarbarzin independently confirmed Pirouzi’s statement. He said they concluded that the UFO had deliberately jammed both the aircraft and control tower electronics. About the objects that seemed to shoot out of the UFO, Azarbarzin said, « The pilots called them fireballs, but we all thought that they were very powerful waves of electromagnetism, which jammed all the electronics starting from VHF, UHF, fire control system, gun radar, gun communications, everything. Everything was gone. »

Azarbarzin also said that the copilot got a good look at the UFO when the second F-4 came out of its emergency dive and passed underneath it. He told both Sightings and researcher Dr. Bruce Maccabee the copilot could see the shape, which he said was round like a plate or just like a saucer, with a canopy or cockpit that looked like half a ball bathed in a dim orange or yellowish light, but with no visible crew.[9]

When all factors were considered, including the extraordinary rate of acceleration displayed by the UFO, Azarbarzin concluded that the UFO had outperformed any known human aircraft.

This conclusion was relayed to General Hatemi, the Shah’s personal military advisory, who instructed Azararzin to give his report to the U.S. Military Assistance Advisory Group in Tehran (MAAG). In charge of MAAG and chief U.S. Air Force military advisory to the Iranians was General Richard Secord. Secord declined to be interviewed. Gen. Azarbarzin refused to state publicly whether Secord had seen the report, but another high Iranian Air Force commander, Mamoud Sabahat, told Sightings that he was present in Tehran to attend a meeting on the night of the incident. « This UFO event was the first time in our Air Force’s history that anything had happened like this. It would have been a usual and customary part of the military system to put him [Secord] at that meeting. »

Gen. Azarbarzin also told Maccabee that the complete records of the investigation had been turned over to the U.S. Air Force. However, the USAF has steadfastly maintained that their only record of the incident was provided in the DIA document originally prepared by a USAF officer who interviewed the pilot of the second F-4.

About his personal opinion, Gen. Azarbarzin told Sightings, « I believe in UFOs. I cannot ignore their existence. They want to find some way of contacting the people of earth. They are trying, and they are going to do it. » Azarbarzin’s opinion was echoed by Amir Kamyabipour, former deputy commander of operations in the Iranian Air Force. Because of what he experienced first-hand during this incident, he believes, « UFOs are trying to find some way to make contact with our world. I am positive of this. »

[edit] Miscellaneous details and documents

In the October 1, 1976 issue of the Iran Times from Washington, D.C., an apparent firsthand account from Lt. Jafari, the pilot of the second jet interceptor, was published, based on a tape of the actual pursuit. The aircraft flew towards Tehran at over the speed of sound. Jafari said that on seeing him coming, the UFO increased its speed. ‘It was half the size of the moon as seen from earth,’ he said. ‘It was radiating violet, orange, and white light about three times as strong as moonlight.' »

Jafari was ordered to return to base if he was unable to get near, and Jafari cut off pursuit. As he was returning, he « told air controllers that the UFO had doubled back on its pursuers, and he was in danger of being forced down. ‘Something is coming at me from behind. …I think it is going to crash into me. It has just passed by, missing me narrowly…’ The disturbed voice of the pilot was clear on the tape. » [10]

The article also recounted how the pilot spoke of a « bright round object, with a circumference of about 4.5 meters, leave the UFO. » It also said that the authenticity of the object had already been confirmed by the two F-4 pilots, several control tower operators, and witnesses on the ground who reported a « bright body » flit across the sky while others reported seeing « some bright thing » fall from the sky.

Another document later came to light revealing that a very similar UFO was sighted in Morocco from many locations about 3 to 4 hours later, or 0100 to 0200 hours local time on September 19. The document was from the American embassy in Rabat, Morocco to the U.S. State Department, dated September 25, 1976–« Subject: Request for Info. Unidentified Flying Objects. » It recounted that the Moroccan police had received numerous reports of an object generally flying parallel to the Atlantic coast at low altitude. It had a silvery luminous circular or tubular shape and was giving off intermittent trails of bright sparks and fragments. It made no noise. One of the embassy’s unnamed briefers said he had seen it himself, and that it appeared to be traveling slowly like an aircraft preparing to land. At first it appeared disc-shaped, but took on a tubular appearance as it got closer.

Secretary of State Henry Kissinger responded ten days later and took the official U.S. policy line on UFOs. Kissinger claimed the Condon Committee report had shown that all UFOs could be attributed to natural causes and no further study was warranted. Kissinger said people had probably seen a meteor or a decaying satellite part for which there was no re-entry record.[11]

In a search for further information on the case in National Security Agency records, it was also found that an article on the Tehran incident had been written in 1978 (see Gallery) in the classified MIJI Quarterly a periodical published by the Electronics Security Command at San Antonio, Texas. The journal contained narrative summaries of all electronic warfare « meaconing« , « intrusion, » « jamming, » and « interference » incidents (hence the acronym MIJI—see [1]). The report basically provided the details in the DIA document, but prefaced the article as follows:

« Sometime in his career, each pilot can expect to encounter strange, unusual happenings which will never be adequately or entirely explained by logic or subsequent investigation. The following article recounts just such an episode as reported by two F-4 Phantom crews of the Imperial Iranian Air Force during late 1976. No additional information or explanation of the strange events has been forthcoming: the story will be filed away and probably forgotten, but it makes interesting, and possibly disturbing, reading. » [12]

[edit] Skeptical explanation and analysis

In his book UFOs: The Public Deceived, debunker Philip J. Klass claimed the witnesses initially saw an astronomical body, probably Jupiter, and pilot incompetence and equipment malfunction accounted for the rest.

The bright object was first noticed by witnesses in Shemiran, the northernmost district of Tehran. One of the witnesses in the northeastern part of Tehran was Gen. Yousefi himself, who ordered the jet interceptions. The jets were scrambled from Shahrokhi AFB in Hamadan, about 175 miles (282 km) west-southwest of Tehran, and vectored to a point 40 miles (64 km) north of central Tehran. However, Jupiter was in the east. Thus the UFO was approximately 90 degrees away from Jupiter at the time. In addition, the second F-4 chased the UFO from northern to southern Tehran. Again, Jupiter would be at nearly 90 degrees to the pursuit trajectory.

Furthermore, both F-4’s picked up and tracked something on their radar, impossible for an astronomical object like a star or planet. Many more details of the encounter do not match Klass’ proposed explanation, such as both F-4’s and the control tower losing their electronics with close approach to the UFO and a third civilian plane in the region also losing communications.

Jerome Clark commented, « Klass’s theory presumes a remarkable lack of even rudimentary observing and technical skills on the parts of the Iranian participants. In some ways it would be easier to credit the notion, for which no evidence exists either, that the witnesses consciously fabricated the sighting. Both Gen. Azerbarzin and air controller Perouzi considered the incident thoroughly puzzling. So, as the documents indicate, did American analysts familiar with it. » [13]

[edit] Summary

The incident is regarded by a number of UFO researchers to be one of the premier UFO encounters ever recorded. Some researchers consider it strong evidence for the extraterrestrial origins of the UFO because there was a blackout on the F-4 just when it was going to fire and because of instrumental breakdowns on two different aircraft while they were on the chase. A military spy satellite also recorded this incident. The DSP-1 satellite detected an infrared anomaly during the time of this event that lasted for about an hour.[14]

[edit] Reference to incident in the media

  • The Sightings TV program covered the incident in 1994, interviewing many of the participants. (See above)
  • The Tehran incident was considered one of the ten best UFO cases in a 2007 Canadian documentary Best Evidence by film maker Paul Kimball. The list of best cases was compiled by polling leading UFO researchers. [2]
  • At a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. on November 12, 2007, the pilot of the second F-4, General Parviz Jafari, recounted how he tried to intercept an « object which was flashing with intense red, green, orange and blue light. » Jafari said that, « Four other objects with different shapes separated from the main one, at different times during this close encounter. Whenever they were close to me, my weapons were jammed and my radio communications were garbled. One of the objects headed toward me. I thought it was a missile. I tried to launch a heat seeking missile to it, but my missile panel went out. Another followed me when I was descending on the way back. One of the separated objects landed in an open area radiating a high bright light, in which the sands on the ground were visible. We could hear emergency squash all the way, which was reported by other airliners flying at the time and continued for another couple of days. During my interview at H.Q, after the incident, an American colonel took notes… » When asked if he thought this was an alien spacecraft, he said he was quite sure that it was.[15]

[edit] 1978 Tehran UFO incidents

A somewhat similar UFO incident over Tehran occurred in 1978, again involving electromagnetic interference and U.S. DIA interest. The report was sent by the U.S. Defense Attache’s office to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, part of the normal routing for foreign intelligence reports. As in the 1976 case, the distribution list included the Secretary of State, the NSA, and the CIA. The report was quoted from the Iranian English-language newspaper Tehran Journal, dated July 18, 1978.

The article said that a UFO had been seen by a number of people on the night of July 16, again in the northern part of Tehran. One witness said he saw the object suddenly emerge in the sky and hover directly above him. Witnesses said it was a « strange glowing object » that seemed to be floating southwestward toward Saveh (about halfway between Tehran and Hamadan). Witnesses contacted the National Radio Network and the control tower at Mehrabad, which confirmed the existence of the object but provided no further details. The article added, « Officials from the control tower at Mehrabad Airport and a Lufthansa aircrew also reported unusual readings on their instruments. »

The article also briefly mentioned another recent UFO incident from April 1978. A local pilot said that he and his copilot had photographed a « glittering » object while flying between Ahvaz and Tehran. (Ahvaz is about 200 miles (320 km) southwest of Tehran.) He could not release the photographs until the security division of the civil aviation authorities gave permission. Apparently there was also ground radar corroboration. « A Mehrabad radar control official said that on that occasion they had detected an object some 20 times the size of a jumbo jet on their screens. » Civil aviation authorities were said to be investigating, but the results had not been made public.[16]

[edit] Gallery

Tehran ufo incident 1976 1 censored on wikileaks

Tehran ufo incident 1976 2 censored on wikileaks

Tehran ufo incident 1976 3 : censored on wikileaks

US Air Force files on the incident (page 1)
US Air Force files on the incident (page 2)
US Air Force files on the incident (page 3)

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Morgan, David (November 12, 2007). « Reuters news article concerning the press conference ». Archived from the original on 2007-12-26. http://web.archive.org/web/20071226121458/http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUKN1248419720071112?pageNumber=2&sp=true. Retrieved 2007-11-12. 
  2. ^ « ABC News West Palm Beach video file on the press conference ». http://www.wpbf.com/video/14573588/index.html. Retrieved 2007-11-12. 
  3. ^ « CNN article about the press conference ». November 9, 2007. http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/11/09/simington.ufocommentary/index.html?iref=newssearch. Retrieved 2007-11-12. 
  4. ^ « AFP via Yahoo article about the press conference ». http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071113/sc_afp/usspaceufo_071113021520. Retrieved 2007-11-13. [dead link]
  5. ^ « AFP via Yahoo article about the press conference ». BBC News. 2007-11-13. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7091922.stm. Retrieved 2007-11-13. 
  6. ^ Michaels, 177-185
  7. ^ Good (1986), p. 290
  8. ^ also Good (1986), 290
  9. ^ Clark, 311 Michaels, 182
  10. ^ Fawcett & Greenwood, 85
  11. ^ Fawcett & Greenwood, 86-87
  12. ^ Fawcett & Greenwood, 81
  13. ^ Clark, 312
  14. ^ Good (1996), p. 290
  15. ^ transcript of press conference, originally posted by Steve Kaeser at UFO Updates, Nov. 15, 2007, http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g9SlBpfbdNJ5Sml6ZR1ROk1DoR1A http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0711/12/acd.01.html
  16. ^ Good (1996), 290-291

[edit] External links

[hide]

v • d • e

UFOs and ufology

Incidents

Scientific Studies

UFO conspiracy theory

Culture

Involvement

Skeptics

 
PurportedUFO2cropped.jpg
 
 
Majestic 12 · Area 51 · Bob Lazar · Men in Black · Project Serpo · Disclosure Project
 
 
 


Wikileaks UFO OVNI

Les révélations les plus attendues sur Internet sont celles que Wikileaks devraient révéler au sujet des OVNIS.

Bien que Wikileaks aient reçus beaucoup de documents au sujet des OVNIS, Wikileaks prefere publier uniquement ceux qui sont officiels, comme par exemples des communications des diplomates (cablegate) au sujet des OVNIS.

Pour l’instant pas grand chose à été encore revélé par Wikileaks au sujet des OVNIS, mais Assange vient d’être arreté alors qu’il venait d’annoncer que Wikileaks s’apprete à révéler des doculents à ce sujet. coincidence ?

Pour suivre les révélations à venir sur l’OVNI UFO par Wikileaks, un site web semble intéréssant : http://www.wikileaksufo.com/ (ooops this web site is already censored : see this page / ce site web est deja censure : voir cette page ) voir aussi http://etwatch.wordpress.com/

Déja un premier document officiel décrit un contact entre des OVNIS et des avions en 1976 : http://www.wikileaksufo.com/2010/12/the-tehran-ufo-incident-official-documents/ (ooops this web site is already censored : see this page / ce site web est deja censure : voir cette page )

On espère que d’autres documents seront rendus publics pour que cesse les secrets et manipulations au sujet des OVNIS : en 2010 le public à le droit de savoir ce qui ce passe dans notre ciel, même si les experts n’y comprennent pas grand chose.

Ces révélations à venir se font alors qu’il existe des mouvements d’experts ( UFO Disclosure ) qui poussent les gourvernements à cesser leurs mensonges, dissimulations et manipulations au sujet des OVNIS : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtmpaM0PqyI

Le public saura bientot que nous sommes survolés par des OVNIS depuis très longtemps, et que parfois ces OVNIS ne peuvent pas s’expliquer pas nos connaissances actuelles. C’est le moins qu’on puisse dire au public, et il faut que les agences arretent leurs manipulations pour rendre le sujet OVNI ridicule pour cacher le ridicule de la situation : les meilleurs experts militaires n’y comprennent pas grand chose, et ne peuvent pas empecher les OVNI de survoler (ou peut être plus que cela…) les installations militaires et nucléaires !

Sources :

http://www.setyoufreenews.com/2010/12/wikileaks-chief-expect-ufo-talk-in.html


Même si Paul le poulpe se trompe parfois ses résultats sont meilleurs que le hasard, et même meilleurs que les pronostics des consultants sportifs des emissions télévisions.

Article sur Paul le poulpe dans Wikipedia

Comment expliquer ses bons résultats sérieusement ?

Cela remet en question ce que nous pensons du hasard ; en effet certaines expériences tendent à démontrer que le hasard peut être influencé par la pensé des observateurs.

Avant de rigoler, regardez plutot cela :

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tychoscope#Exp.C3.A9rience_men.C3.A9e_avec_des_poussins

http://www.paranormal-info.com/Les-travaux-de-Rene-Peoc-h.html

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Générateur_aléatoire#Parapsychologie

http://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CB8QFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnoosphere.princeton.edu%2Fpapers%2Fnelson-pp.pdf&ei=yag5TJKMAYGqsQbt47nvBg&usg=AFQjCNH3KkN0jdXh7QWJnaTAsijTQ-3mjg&sig2=xSrDTOzf5a6vKv9F49rf-Q

Quelques définitions :
Psychokinèse (pk) : capacité à influencer mentalement un objet, un processus ou un système sans l’utilisation de mécanismes ou d’énergies connues.

Micro-psychokinèse (micro-pk) : Psychokinèse effectuée sur des systèmes micro-physiques aléatoires, tel le bruit électronique.

Générateur Numérique Aléatoire (GNA) : Actuellement, système électronique servant à générer des nombres aléatoires.

Tychoscope : Mobile se déplaçant de façon aléatoire selon un GNA

En conclusion, on peut se demander si l’observateur n’influence pas le hasard !…